HNC

The High Negotiations Committee has launched its vision for a political transitional process in Syria. The HNC vision was unveiled under the auspices of the British Foreign Minister, Mr. Boris Johnson, and in the presence of a number of foreign ministers.

Download full document here:

The High Negotiation Commission Executive Framework for a Political Solution Based on the Geneva Communiqué September 2016

 

High Negotiations Committee

 
Speech delivered by Dr. Hijab at the meeting of the Syria Contact Group in Munich
 
 
11 February 2016
  
The High Negotiations Committee (HNC) adopted - since its inception on 10th December 2015 - the task of representing the peace process, pushing for a political solution and supporting efforts to bring about a ceasefire aimed at alleviating the suffering of the Syrian people.
 
The HNC is keen to achieve this aim through diplomatic channels and calls for respecting international law, and in particular Articles 12 and 13 of Security Council Resolution 2254, with respect to:  lifting the siege, enabling access for humanitarian aid, the release of all detainees, halting aerial and artillery bombardment of civilians and civilian targets, and that all parties immediately abide and honour their obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law.
 
To achieve this, the HNC has stressed that reducing the suffering of the Syrian people is a humanitarian issue which must be prioritised and addressed outside the sphere of the political conflict.  We continue to insist that it must not be considered concurrent to the negotiations, but rather beyond negotiations; it is plainly unacceptable to exploit human suffering for political bargaining and leverage.
 
In spite of this proactive approach and the positive response expressed in support of the efforts undertaken by the UN Special Envoy to Syria, Mr. Staffan de Mistura, to stop the war and to embark on a political process, and to engage in confidence-building initiatives, the regime and its allies, however, have surprised the international community by working to derail the political process through intensified bombardment of various Syrian cities and regions.  This has and continues to claim the lives of hundreds as well as cause further displacement of tens of thousands of Syrians who continue to suffer under this unjust siege as a result of the regime’s relentless policy of repression.
 
The most recent military escalation and Russian violations coinciding with Moscow's call for a ceasefire were clearly not intended to end the suffering of the Syrians, but rather for the purpose of securing tenuous gains achieved purely to maintain the regime.  Furthermore, it is clear that Russia is fully aware that the regime is unable to sustain its hold on territory recently gained with the help of foreign forces, sectarian militias and mercenaries.  To protect these fragile gains, Russia is now calling for a cease-fire in full knowledge that this will not achieve the desired security, peace and stability for Syria or its neighbouring countries.
 
The HNC reaffirms its position in demanding an immediate cessation of all military operations, lifting the siege, tackling the starvation crisis, ending the repression and forced displacement, and reemphasises that any cease-fire agreement must be conducted in accordance with international law and the relevant UN resolutions, particularly Security Council Resolution 2254; and not on the back of military operations carried out by joint Russian-Iranian forces in an attempt to tilt the balance on the ground and to legitimise the crimes committed against the Syrian people.
 
The international community’s condemnation of Russian operations held the regime and its allies responsible for derailing the political process and highlighted their attempts to avoid inevitable outcomes of the political process.  These most recent operations were and are intended to thwart the efforts of the UN envoy to Syria, and to undermine any agreement to stop the fighting within the framework of a negotiating agenda leading to the creation of a transitional governing body with full executive powers, necessitating the removal of Assad from power and ensuring all perpetrators do not escape justice.
 
Refusing to come to terms with the outcomes and the obligations of the political transition process, the regime and its allies intensified their efforts to derail UN initiatives by first questioning the credibility of the HNC, then attempting to classify opposition factions as terrorist groups, followed by meddling in the selection of the opposition’s negotiating delegation, and later coupled with attempts to include other delegations and participants in the negotiations, and finally, when all such attempts resulted in failure; they redeployed to escalate their bombardment in order to impose a fait accompli on the ground.
 
In light of this, the HNC calls for a cessation of the fighting through the announcement of a truce, which should test the seriousness of the regime and its allies in pursuing a meaningful political process.  This however does not mean that the HNC will tolerate attempts to exploit such truce and laden it with agreements to consolidate fragile gains in areas the Russians and the Iranians realise the regime is unable to sustain.
 
The cessation of hostilities must be within the framework of a comprehensive agreement that guarantees the removal of all foreign forces, sectarian militias and mercenaries from the country.  The Syrian people will not accept foreign forces to remain on Syrian territory; this would threaten regional balances and pose a threat to international security.  Furthermore, it must be noted again that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard continues to recruit mercenary groups to fight in Syria, while Moscow continues to supply the regime with advanced weapons and trains foreign militias on their use.  It is alarmingly clear that both Moscow and Tehran are not serious about bringing an end to the fighting, on the contrary, they are destabilising regional security, encouraging sectarianism, and working to divide the country.
 
The HNC reiterates the need for a cease-fire in accordance to a comprehensive framework which is approved by the United Nations and includes effective mechanisms to enforce and monitor the cessation of hostilities and the adherence of all parties.  The framework to this cease-fire must be reached through a negotiation process, a process the regime has thus far attempted to evade.
 
 
 

Speech by Riad Hijab at the 52nd Munich Security Conference

14 February 2016

Ladies and Gentlemen,

The 52nd Munich Security Conference convenes against a backdrop of unprecedented security tensions in Syria and the region, due to a faltering political process, intensified Russian aerial bombardment and an increasingly rapid pace of external aggression on the Syrian people in different cities and regions.

The country is suffering from an appalling humanitarian situation as a result of operations launched by the regime and its allies, killing hundreds of thousands and displacing millions of Syrians.  The level of destruction and devastation of infrastructure is insurmountable in its barbarity. The targeting of populated areas, public facilities, schools, hospitals, medical personnel and relief teams, in addition to forced displacement and the repressive policies of the regime, have and continue to contribute to the widening of the crisis and its spill-over beyond Syria's borders.  Furthermore, these factors have and continue to contribute to the spread of extremism, terror groups and extremist cross-border militias.

Hundreds of Syrians die every day from air and artillery bombardment, poison gas, cluster bombs, torture, starvation, cold and drowning; it is horrifying that the largest percentage of the victims are civilians, especially women and children.

The implications of these horrific events on regional and international security are evident:  we are now faced with a mass exodus of refugees and a colossal number of asylum seekers in various Arab and Western countries.  We are also confronting concerted recruitment of young people from across Europe and other countries to fight alongside Da'esh. This is undoubtedly one of the most significant threats to global security. The Syrian people continue to live the horror in a state of utter despair following the failure of the international community to stop the violations committed against them.

One cannot focus on the appalling security and humanitarian situation in Syria in isolation of regional developments.  The security balance in the Middle East is interlocked with regional and international security.  The region's strategic importance extends across many continents due to its strategic significance to world powers, and those with deeply entrenched interests.

It could be argued that the current security deterioration in the region comes as a result of growing regional and international conflict and rivalry over the Syria, which has now effectively turned into a failed state because of the wilfulness of Assad and his clique to remain in power despite losing legitimacy, sovereignty and control over the territory.  The regime remains reliant on the support of the Iran-Russia axis; these powers have opted for direct military intervention against the Syrian Revolution, which could engulf the entire region to the brink of a devastating war between various powers.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

The past five years have marked significant shifts in both the security and military environments.  Most notably, strategic importance has shifted away from major regional players to other locations with geographically ambiguous futures, in a fierce battle with terrorism, which has established a foothold in failed states and has targeted Arab as well as Western capitals, and is casting a huge web over the young people of this century. It is clear that the survival and continuation of repressive regimes pose a risk to global security, particularly due to their exclusive dependence on security and military institutions, rather than legitimacy and popular support.

Instead of taking responsible initiatives to address these threats, some world powers exploited the fragility of these countries to expand their sphere of influence by exploiting existing contentious and divisive issues to secure their strategic interests with callous regard for the interests of the people of those countries.

We therefore argue that the solution to the Syrian crisis lies in: neutralising the external forces of Russia, Iran, and their militias in stopping their hostile aggression, and aerial bombing of civilians, and to fight the real source of terrorism in all its forms. Followed by launching the process for political transition within a pluralistic system inclusive of all Syrians, by establishing a transitional governing body with full executive authority. Assad and his despotic regime, with their horrifyingly bloodied past, will have no role in this transition or any future political arrangements.

Since its inception on the 10th of December 2015, the Supreme Commission for Negotiations made a strategic decision to pursue the political process and complement international efforts to achieve a political transition through negotiations sponsored by the United Nations.  You have witnessed the cohesion and solidarity of the Syrian opposition, and its ability to work cooperatively within a unified vision for the future of Syria.

However, the regime and its allies remain unwilling to accept the inevitable outcomes of the political process, which will remove the country from a state of chaos to one of civil peace.  Without doubt, repressive states cannot survive nor flourish, for such states are not in harmony with their populations; their security and their interests are contradictory to those of their populations.

As the General Coordinator of the Commission, I take the opportunity during this important annual conference to reiterate that the security threats my country and other countries in the region are facing, makes it imperative for the international community to formulate appropriate strategies, compatible with the size and scope of the threats and ongoing transformations, particularly that these clearly have bearing on the internal security and regional security of countries around the world.

To achieve this, an appropriate atmosphere for negotiations must be created, especially with regard to: lifting the siege and blockades, enabling access for humanitarian aid to all those in need, releasing detainees, halting air and artillery bombardment against civilians and civilian targets, and insisting on all parties to immediately honour their obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law. Last but not least, to cease forced displacement and all other violations which the UN has described as war crimes.

We must therefore emphasise that the most effective way to eliminate Da'esh and other extremist groups begins with the removal of the Assad regime, which utilises terrorism as a pretext to prolong its stay in power.  Furthermore, fighting terrorism in Syria requires the removal of all foreign fighters, mercenaries and sectarian groups supported by Iran; who have fuelled sectarian tensions and committed humanitarian violations against the Syrian people.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

This fifty-second annual conference, taking place in Germany, carries many important meanings, which must be noted.   This conference should remind us of the resilience of the European people to recover from the traumas of the first half of the twentieth century following the two world wars.  These wars had grave detrimental impacts on international security.   But it was not until Europe shook off the afflictions of totalitarianism, fascism and Nazism which spread the spirit of hatred, intolerance, injustice and discrimination, that it was able to achieve development and prosperity.

The allied forces could not have won that war with a policy of appeasing dictatorships and totalitarian regimes, which they must confront with decisiveness.

I speak to you on behalf of a people who despite the incredible suffering are still full of spirit and determination to struggle for a return to their homeland, aspiring for a better future.

I am here to convey to you the aspirations of a nation looking from underneath the rubble of demolished homes to the dawn of a new renaissance where there is no room for repression, injustice and discrimination.

Thank you.

 

The Creation of The High Negotiations Committee

 

 
Dr. Riad Hijab announced that meetings held by the High Negotiations Committee (HNC) on Sunday and Monday (January 3-4 2016); come as continuation of the work entrusted to the Committee in accordance with the Riyadh Conference on 9-10 December 2015.
 
Dr. Hijab confirmed the agenda included the selection of the negotiating team on basis of qualification, eligibility and in- line with professional standards in order to meet the magnitude of the challenges faced by the Syrian people.
 
The HNC members agreed to adopt the principles within the Riyadh statement as the basis for negotiations; which defined the negotiating parameters, and which include: affirming Syrian territorial integrity, maintaining state institutions, restructuring the security and military institutions, the rejection of terrorism in all its forms and the establishment of a pluralistic system representative of all the Syrian people; Bashar al-Assad and officials of his regime have no place in any future political arrangements.
 
The Committee members also agreed on the urgency for total adherence to Articles (12) and (13) of Security Council resolution 2254 before embarking on further preparations for the negotiating process; in particular, lifting the siege imposed on cities and besieged regions in order to enable humanitarian agencies access to deliver aid to all those in need, releasing all unlawfully imprisoned detainees, the cessation of aerial and artillery bombardment of civilians and civilian targets, for all parties to immediately honour their obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law, and other goodwill and confidence-building measures with which negotiations may be possible.
 
In addition to adhering to the principles declared in the Riyadh Conference, Dr Hijab added that the Geneva Communiqué (30 June 2012) also represents the foundations for negotiations for the transitional phase; specifically the principles on the establishment of a transitional ruling committee carrying clear unambiguous executive authority.
 
Dr. Hijab stressed that selecting the negotiating team comes as part of the Syrian opposition’s keenness to cooperate with international efforts to find a political solution to the crisis in Syria; but he also stressed that this cooperation is most certainly not a carte blanche for the regime and its allies to continue committing crimes against the Syrian people in repeated violations of international law.  Indeed, Security Council resolution 2254 has many loopholes, cynically used by the regime and their allies to continue their violently belligerent agenda in total disregard for any political process.
 
With the continued indiscriminate shelling of civilians, the insistence of some to conveniently and unjustly classify opposition groups as terrorists, and attempts by the regime and its allies to determine selection of opposition delegation, it is no wonder that Dr Hijab questioned the feasibility of this negotiating process. He pointed out that the Security Council resolution in New York intended to defer disagreement amongst international powers, without attempting to engage with or resolve such disagreements.  Dr Hijab warned of the risks of prolonging the crisis and responding to the attempts by the regime and its allies to disrupt the political process through protracted negotiations whilst the regime continues its systematic bombardment and killing.
 
Dr Hijab stressed that the obstruction of the political process also serves the agendas of terrorist groups with proven ties to the Syrian regime.
 
On the eve of his meeting with the UN envoy to Syria, Staffan de Mistura, Dr Hijab confirmed he will be explicitly conveying the Syrian opposition’s message: "If Bashar al-Assad’s regime has accepted violations of Syria's sovereignty, territory and airspace, and relentless assault on the Syrian people by some international powers, groups of mercenaries and cross-border militias, the Syrian Revolution on the other hand has emerged on foundations of reclaiming sovereignty over all Syrian territory and the preservation of lives and property - no compromise on the unity of Syrian territory; there is no room for any outside interference in the selection of the opposition’s delegation for negotiations; there is no room for the continuation of Bashar al-Assad, his regime and their symbols in Syria during the transitional period or in any political future. "
Top